The
conclusion must be that, contrary to the finding of the trial court,
the noise continuously emitted, day and night, constitutes an actionable
nuisance for which the appellant is entitled to relief, by requiring
the appellee company to adopt the necessary measures to deaden or reduce
the sound at the plaintiff's house, by replacing the interlink wire
fence with a partition made of sound absorbent material, since the
relocation of the substation is manifestly impracticable and would be
prejudicial to the customers of the Electric Company who are being
serviced from the substation.
No comments:
Post a Comment